Cases 41 - 50 of 132
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv01279
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv00358
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 794 Rehabilitation Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 17-606
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
PUBLIC CITIZEN, INC. et al v. TRUMP et al
as 1:2017cv00253
Plaintiff:
PUBLIC CITIZEN, INC. , NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL, INC. and COMMUNICATION WORKERS OF AMERICA, AFL-CIO
Defendant:
DONALD J. TRUMP, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, MARK SANDY and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
Wade v. Chao et al
as 2:2017cv00004
Plaintiff:
E. K. Wade
Defendant:
Elaine Chao, Woody Gilliland, Doug Betten and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Nguyen et al v. Bush et al
as 1:2015cv00641
Defendant:
Michael R. Bloomberg, George W. Bush, Elaine Chao and others
Plaintiff:
Thomas Nguyen and Tiffany Nguyen
PANYNJ:
Port Authority of New York/New Jersey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2008cv02755
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
RICHES v. BUSH et al
as 2:2006cv01055
Defendant:
USAMA BIN LADEN, SHADY RECORDS INC, GEORGE W. BUSH and others
Plaintiff:
JONATHAN LEE RICHES
Petitioner:
DANIEL ANTHONY WEYMOUTH and PATRICK J. SIMPSON
Not Yet Classified:
M. C. HAMMER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 10-2048
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Hilda Solis, Secretary v. Hooglands Nursery LLC, et al
as 09-30506
Plaintiff - Appellee:
ELAINE CHAO, SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF LABOR and HILDA L SOLIS, SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Defendant - Appellant:
HOOGLANDS NURSERY, L.L.C. and MICHAEL HOOGLAND
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
