Cases 41 - 50 of 62
Frederick Davis v. St. Louis County, et al
as 12-4006
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Frederick James Davis
Defendant - Appellee:
St. Louis County, Charles Dooley, Julia Childrey and others
Fillingham v. US Department of Justice et al
as 6:2012cv00938
Plaintiff:
Frederick James Fillingham
Defendant:
US Department of Justice, United States Attorneys, Office of Information Policy and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Spickerman v. Astrue
as 3:2012cv00727
Plaintiff:
Frederick James Spickerman
Defendant:
Michael Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383
Hill Nissan, Inc. v. Jenkins Nissan, Inc. et al
as 8:2011cv02757
Plaintiff:
Hill Nissan, Inc.
Defendant:
Jenkins Nissan, Inc., Frederick James Jenkins, Brian M. Fivecoat and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Fillingham v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 5:2011cv00204
Petitioner:
Frederick James Fillingham
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Skaggs v. Sanky et al
as 8:2011cv00374
Defendant:
Gerald Bailey, David Sanky and Brian Shaw
Plaintiff:
Frederick James Skaggs
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
United States v. Frederick James One Feather
as 11-2138
Plaintiff - Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant - Appellant:
Frederick James One Feather
Moore v. Wolfe et al
as 1:2011cv01014
Petitioner:
Frederick James Moore
Respondent:
John Wolfe and The Attorney General of the State of Maryland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
United States of America v. Frederick James Staves
as 2:2011cv00714
Defendant:
Frederick James Staves
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Duane Johnson v. Frederick Sullivan, et al
as 10-5425
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Duane Joseph Johnson
Defendant - Appellee:
Frederick James Sullivan, Abraham C. Blitzer and Steven J. McCool, Mallon & McCool, LLC
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
