Cases 41 - 50 of 454
AKIN v 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2022cv00769
Plaintiff:
ROBERT AKIN, JOSHUA ANDERSON, ROBERT BRIDGES and others
Defendant:
3M COMPANY and AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hylton et al v. Newrez, LLC
as 1:2021cv00051
Plaintiff:
Carl M. Hylton and Patricia M. Hylton
Defendant:
Newrez, LLC d/b/a Shellpoint Mortgage Servicing
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv05243
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv00138
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1400
DeWayne Baker v. Ivan Gilmore
as 21-2227
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DEWAYNE BAKER, a/k/a Dwayne Baker
Defendant / Appellee:
IVAN T. GILMORE, Warden, A. HICKS, Assistant Warden, K. H. TUCKER, Institutional Ombudsman and others
Defendant:
COFFEEWOOD CORRECTIONAL CENTER, T. HARVEY, Regional Ombudsman Central Region, MARCUS M. HODGES, Regional Administrator Central Region and others
Hylton v. Strollo
as 3:2021cv01414
Plaintiff:
Clarence Hylton
Defendant:
David Strollo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Hylton et al v. CONSOL Energy, Inc.
as 2:2021cv00559
Plaintiff:
Donald Hylton and Greever Asbury
Defendant:
CONSOL Energy, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
HYLTON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv58644
Plaintiff:
HARROLD DEAN HYLTON
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HYLTON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv53824
Plaintiff:
RICHARD DALE HYLTON
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HYLTON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv43526
Plaintiff:
GEORGE ELLIS HYLTON
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
