Cases 41 - 50 of 6,629
Howell v. State of Mississippi et al
as 1:2024cv00057
Plaintiff:
April Mae Howell
Defendant:
State of Mississippi, Delbert Hosemann, Secretary of State Michael Watson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Shreves v. Godfrey, et al.
as 24-1692
Plaintiff:
RICHARD E. SHREVES
Defendant:
DEMETRIC GODFREY, CRYSTAL THOMPSON, BRIAN GOOTKIN and others
Holland v. Bennett
as 2:2024cv00370
Petitioner:
Demeko Brazille Holland
Respondent:
Jason Bennett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Branden Holland v. J. Chavarria, et al
as 24-10804
Plaintiff:
BRANDEN HOLLAND
Defendant:
J. CHAVARRIA and J. BASSILLO
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02141
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Brown v. Village of South Holland, et al
as 1:2024cv02170
Plaintiff:
Christian Brown
Defendant:
Village of South Holland, and Detective Coleman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2024cv03070
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
ESTATE OF BRENDA HOLLAND et al v. LLT MANAGEMENT LLC et al
as 3:2024cv03009
Defendant:
LLT MANAGEMENT LLC, LTL MANAGEMENT LLC, JANSSEN PHARMACEUTICALS, INC and others
Plaintiff:
ESTATE OF BRENDA HOLLAND and BARRY HOLLAND
Not Yet Classified:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES, AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00124
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01938
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
