Cases 41 - 50 of 67
Haun v. Erwin et al
as 4:2016cv00043
Plaintiff:
Leslie Haun
Defendant:
James Erwin, David Higgs, Micheal Robinson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hightower v. Thompson et al
as 0:2015cv00093
Plaintiff:
James Hightower
Defendant:
LaDonna Thompson, James Erwin, James Sweat and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jimenez v. Webb et al
as 1:2015cv03410
Plaintiff:
Fabian Jimenez
Defendant:
The Hertz Corporation, United States of America and James Erwin Webb
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
Pfeifer v. Thompson et al
as 5:2015cv00007
Plaintiff:
Mark Pfeifer
Defendant:
LaDonna Thompson , James Erwin , Doug Crall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ismael Aldaz et al v. City of Los Angeles et al
as 2:2014cv05642
Plaintiff:
Ismael Aldaz, Sr, Maribel Arambula, Eddie Badillo and others
Defendant:
City of Los Angeles and Does
Schaeffer v. Commonwealth of Kentucky et al
as 3:2014cv00505
Plaintiff:
Ronald G. Schaeffer
Defendant:
Commonwealth of Kentucky, Capital of Kentucky, James Erwin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jimenez v. Webb et al
as 1:2014cv03952
Plaintiff:
Fabian Jimenez
Defendant:
The Hertz Corporation and James Erwin Webb
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
ODOM v. HILAND et al
as 1:2014cv01014
Defendant:
ALAN BROWN, JAMIE CARAWAY, JOEL DUNLAP and others
Plaintiff:
GLENN D. ODOM, II
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson et al v. SunTrust Bank et al
as 1:2014cv00172
Plaintiff:
Margaret R Johnson, Margaret J Kell and Catherine A Johnson
Defendant:
SunTrust Bank, Fred Speakman, Darlene Bannis and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22
SYREK et al v. SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION et al
as 2:2013cv05910
Plaintiff:
JOHN SYREK , GREGORY ADAMS , SHIRLEY MCCOY and others
Defendant:
SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION and MCKESSON CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
