Cases 41 - 50 of 77
Mannato v. Wells et al
as 1:2011cv04402
Plaintiff:
Edward Mannato
Defendant:
James M. Wells, III , Thomas E. Freeman , Mark A. Chancy and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Wells v. Astrue
as 5:2011cv05762
Plaintiff:
James Louis Wells
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
WELLS v. GLAXOSMITHKLINE, LLC
as 2:2011cv06883
Plaintiff:
JAMES E. WELLS
Defendant:
GLAXOSMITHKLINE, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hall v. Lumpkins et al.
as 4:2011cv03739
Plaintiff:
Darrell Lee Hall
Defendant:
Warner G Lumpkins, Larry D Nutt, James F Wells and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hall v. Lumpkins et al
as 3:2011cv00515
Plaintiff:
Darrell Lee Hall
Defendant:
Warner G Lumpkins, Larry D Nutt, James F Wells and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wells v. GlaxoSmithKline, LLC
as 1:2011cv06152
Plaintiff:
James E. Wells
Defendant:
GlaxoSmithKline, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
William B. Fisch, et al v. SunTrust Banks, Inc., et al
as 11-11607
Plaintiff - Appellee:
WILLIAM B. FISCH, and, PAUL J. HELLMAN, SUNIL KAPILASHRIMI, and, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated and others
Defendant - Appellant:
BENEFITS PLAN COMMITTEE OF SUNTRUST BANKS, INC. 401(K) PLAN, FRANCES L. BREEDEN, STEVE CASTLE and others
SunTrust, et al v. William B. Fisch
as 11-90001
Petitioner:
SUNTRUST BANKS, INC., Suntrust Bank, ALSTON D. CORRELL, DAVID H. HUGHES and others
Respondent:
WILLIAM B. FISCH, and, SUNIL KAPILASHRIMI, and, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, DANIELLE CLAY and others
First Security Group, Inc. v. Wells
as 1:2010cv00306
Plaintiff:
First Security Group, Inc.
Defendant:
James Alan Wells
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
WELLS v. FLOYD COUNTY, INDIANA et al
as 4:2010cv00138
Defendant:
FLOYD COUNTY, INDIANA, DARRELL MILLS and EUGENE D. PERROT
Plaintiff:
JAMES T. WELLS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
