Cases 41 - 50 of 817
Stinson, III v. Schiebner
as 2:2023cv11201
Plaintiff:
James Allen Stinson, III
Defendant:
James Schiebner
Farrow v. Harpe
as 6:2023cv00158
Petitioner:
James Allen Farrow and James Alan Farrow
Respondent:
Steven Harpe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Roberts v. McFadden et al
as 6:2023cv06230
Plaintiff:
Chavana Roberts
Defendant:
Johnathan McFadden, Tiffany Kincade, Chardonnae Barfield and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
James Lutz v. Harold Clarke
as 23-6370
Petitioner / Appellant:
JAMES ALLEN LUTZ
Respondent / Appellee:
HAROLD C. CLARKE
James Wilford v. State Treasurer
as 23-1327
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMES ALLEN WILFORD
Defendant / Appellee:
STATE TREASURER
Meyers et al v. GlaxoSmithKline (America) Inc. et al
as 3:2023cv21760
Plaintiff:
James Allen Meyers and Gary Thomas
Defendant:
GlaxoSmithKline (America) Inc., GlaxoSmithKline LLC, GlaxoSmithKline plc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity
Arnold et al v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2023cv01239
Plaintiff:
Ronald Hugh Arnold, John Matthew Abboud, Frank T Abel and others
Defendant:
3M Company, AGC Chemicals Americas Inc, Amerex Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Brian Adams, et al v. 3M Company
as 23-5232
Plaintiff / Appellee:
BRIAN ADAMS, ALICE ADAMS, EDWARD ADAMS and others
Defendant / Appellant:
3M COMPANY, fka Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company
Defendant:
MINE SAFETY APPLIANCES, et al.
Amicus Curiae:
U.S. CHAMBER OF COMMERCE
Arnold et al v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2023cv00286
Plaintiff:
Ronald Hugh Arnold, John Matthew Abboud, Frank T Abel and others
Defendant:
3M Company, AGC Chemicals Americas Inc, Amerex Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Wilford #264510 v. State Treasurer
as 1:2023cv00228
Plaintiff:
James Allen Wilford #264510
Defendant:
State Treasurer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
