Cases 41 - 50 of 62
Hawkins v. Prudden
as 4:2013cv02506
Petitioner:
John Daniel Hawkins, Jr.
Respondent:
Douglas J. Prudden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Hawkins v. Stephens, Director TDCJ-CID
as 1:2013cv00691
Plaintiff:
John Fitzgerald Hawkins
Defendant:
William Stephens, Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Hawkins v. Stephens, Director TDCJ-CID
as 2:2013cv00233
Petitioner:
John Fitzgerald Hawkins
Respondent:
William Stephens, Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Hawkins v. Prudden
as 4:2013cv02325
Petitioner:
John Daniel Hawkins, Jr.
Respondent:
Douglas J. Prudden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Keene v. Hawkins et al
as 2:2013cv00049
Plaintiff:
Brittany Mae Keene
Defendant:
John Wesley Hawkins and Barbour County Commission
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hawkins v. Prudden
as 4:2013cv00313
Petitioner:
John Daniel Hawkins, Jr.
Respondent:
Douglas Prudden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hawkins v. Superintendent
as 3:2013cv00105
Petitioner:
John A Hawkins
Respondent:
Superintendent
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hawkins v. Astrue
as 2:2013cv02044
Plaintiff:
John H. Hawkins
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Hawkins et al vs. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
as 3:2012cv60021
Plaintiff:
Helen Jean Hawkins and John Edward Hawkins
Defendant:
Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. , Boehringer Ingelheim Pharma GMBH & Co. KG, Boehringer Ingelheim International GMBH and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hawkins et al vs. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
as KYE/6:12-cv-00045
Plaintiff:
Helen Jean Hawkins and John Edward Hawkins
Defendant:
Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. , Boehringer Ingelheim Pharma GMBH & Co. KG , Boehringer Ingelheim International GMBH and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
