Cases 41 - 50 of 178
Gayden v. Warden, FCC Coleman - Low
as 5:2022cv00131
Petitioner:
M.D. John Matthew Gayden, Jr.
Respondent:
Warden, FCC Coleman - Low
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
ERICKSON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2022cv03237
Plaintiff:
JOHN MATTHEW ERICKSON
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Young v. Ahern Rentals, Inc.
as 2:2022cv00295
Plaintiff:
John Matthew Young
Defendant:
Ahern Rentals Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Declaratory Judgemen
Gayden v. Lane
as 5:2022cv00104
Petitioner:
John Matthew Gayden, Jr.
Respondent:
Kathy P. Lane and U.S. Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Gayden v. Lane
as 8:2022cv00390
Petitioner:
John Matthew Gayden, Jr.
Respondent:
Kathy P. Lane and U.S. Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Nelson v. ADMT Imports, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv00066
Plaintiff:
Symidra Nelson
Defendant:
ADMT Imports, Inc. an Alabama corporation doing business as Enterprise Kia, Atlantic Global Financing Inc., John Matthew Gottuso and others
Cause Of Action: 49 U.S.C. § 32701 Odometer Disclosure
Lilley, Jeffrey v. Matthews, John et al
as 3:2022cv00008
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Lilley
Defendant:
Wood County, John Matthews, Derek Phillippi and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ahern Rentals Inc. v. Young
as 2:2021cv02190
Plaintiff:
Ahern Rentals Inc.
Defendant:
John Matthew Young
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Gayden v. Sala et al
as 8:2021cv02834
Plaintiff:
John Matthew Gayden, Jr.
Defendant:
Eva Sala and U.S. Department of Justice
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Young v. Ahern Rentals, Inc.
as 3:2021cv00612
Counter Defendant:
John Matthew Young
Counter Claimant:
Ahern Rentals, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
