Cases
Cases 41 - 50 of 62
Rogers et al v. C. R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv26280
Plaintiff: Jana Rogers and Kenneth Rogers
Defendant: C. R. Bard, Inc. and Sofradim Production SAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rogers v. Swarthout We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2013cv01829
Plaintiff: Kenneth Rogers
Defendant: Gary Swarthout
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rogers v. Swarthout We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2013cv04049
Plaintiff: Kenneth Rogers
Defendant: Gary Swarthout
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ACADEMY HILL, INC. et al v. CITY OF LAMBERTVILLE et al
as 3:2013cv05182
Plaintiff: ACADEMY HILL, INC. and MERRICK WILSON
Defendant: CITY OF LAMBERTVILLE , DAVID DELVECCHIO , CITY COUNSEL OF THE CITY OF LAMBERTVILLE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rogers et al v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al
as OHN/1:13-dp-20716
Plaintiff: Wilbert Kenneth Rogers and Doreen Duncan Rogers
Defendant: DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. , DePuy Inc. , DePuy International, Ltd. and others
Rogers et al v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al
as 1:2013dp20716
Plaintiff: Wilbert Kenneth Rogers and Doreen Duncan Rogers
Defendant: DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. , DePuy Inc. , DePuy International Limited and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Rogers v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al
as 3:2012cv00725
Plaintiff: Kenneth Rogers
Defendant: DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. , DePuy Inc., DePuy International Limited and others
Pecial_master: Special Master
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rogers v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al
as TXN/3:12-cv-00725
Plaintiff: Kenneth Rogers
Defendant: DePuy Orthopaedics Inc , Depuy Inc, DePuy International Limited and others
Pecial_master: Special Master
Kenneth Roger
as 10-4062
Petitioner: Kenneth Rogers
Lawrence Earl v. Kevin Ballew, et al
as 10-5052
Plaintiff - Appellant: LAWRENCE EARL
Defendant - Appellee: KEVIN BALLEW, PHIL BREDESEN, DAVID MITCHELL and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?