Cases 41 - 50 of 60
Garner v. Jones et al
as 7:2011cv00318
Defendant:
Janet Bain, Earl Barksdale and Lawrence Jones
Plaintiff:
Michael E. Garner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lawrence Jones v. Ricardo Chavez
as 10-16957
Petitioner - Appellant:
LAWRENCE JONES
Respondent - Appellee:
RICARDO CHAVEZ
Jones v. Sherman et al
as 2:2010cv00172
Plaintiff:
Lawrence Jones
Defendant:
Judge Sherman, Judge Ruban, Judge Ellattien and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lawrence Jones v. United States District Court
as 10-71988
:
In re: LAWRENCE JONES
Petitioner:
LAWRENCE JONES
Respondent:
USDC, TUCSON
Real Party In Interest:
RICARDO CHAVEZ and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Jones v. Ohio et al
as 1:2010cv00107
Defendant:
Ohio, Black Syndicates, Machale King and others
Plaintiff:
Lawrence Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Summit Behavioral Health Care
as 2:2010cv00015
Plaintiff:
Lawrence Jones
Defendant:
Summit Behavioral Health Care
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:1974cv00258
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Intervenor Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
United States v. Lawrence Fullie
as 09-2809
Plaintiff - Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant - Appellant:
Lawrence Fullie, also known as Lawrence Jones
Starcher v. LLB Timber Company, Inc. et al
as 3:2009cv00704
Plaintiff:
Robert Starcher, Robert Starcher, Verna Starcher and others
Defendant:
LLB Timber Company, Inc., Edward Lee, Bradley Joel Dyer and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
USA v. William Jone
as 09-50328
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
WILLIAM LAWRENCE JONES
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
