Cases 41 - 50 of 97,859
John Doe #068 v. Lee et al
as 3:2024cv00613
Plaintiff:
John Doe #068
Defendant:
William Lee and David Rausch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Doe #067 v. Lee et al
as 1:2024cv00051
Plaintiff:
John Doe #067
Defendant:
William Lee and David Rausch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Portillo v. Lubbock County Sheriff
as 5:2024cv00119
Petitioner:
Lee Portillo
Respondent:
Lubbock County Sheriff
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Students for Justice in Palestine, at the University of Houston et al v. Abbott et al
as 1:2024cv00523
Plaintiff:
Students for Justice in Palestine, at the University of Houston, Students for Justice in Palestine, at the University of Texas at Dallas and Democratic Socialists of America
Defendant:
Greg Abbott, University of Houston, University of Houston System Board of Regents and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Felix v. Warden, USP Lee
as 7:2024cv00321
Petitioner:
Benjamin Arellano Felix
Respondent:
Warden, USP Lee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Montez Lee, Jr. v. United States
as 24-2017
Petitioner:
Montez Terriel Lee, Jr.
Respondent:
United States of America
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00016
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Blevins v. Arora et al
as 5:2024cv02954
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Blevins
Defendant:
Nikesh Arora, Nir Zuk, Aparna Bawa and others
Lee Michael Thompson v. Luna Innovations Incorporated et al
as 2:2024cv04068
Plaintiff:
Lee Michael Thompson
Defendant:
Luna Innovations Incorporated, Scott A. Graeff, Eugene J. Nestro and others
Lee v. Loreal USA, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv03982
Plaintiff:
Felicia Ann Lee
Defendant:
Loreal USA, Inc., Loreal USA Products, Inc. and SoftSheen-Carson LLC,
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
