Cases 41 - 50 of 450
Oduwole v. Lyft Inc.
as 4:2023cv01127
Plaintiff:
Odulaja Samson Oduwole
Defendant:
Lyft Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
DOE A.F. v. LYFT, INC. et al
as 2:2023cv03990
Plaintiff:
JANE DOE A.F.
Defendant:
LYFT, INC. and NTIAMOAH BROWN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Enovsys LLC v. Lyft, Inc.
as 3:2023cv05157
Plaintiff:
Enovsys LLC
Defendant:
Lyft, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Sanchez v. Lyft, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv02787
Plaintiff:
Chris Sanchez
Defendant:
Lyft, Inc. and Lyft Bikes and Scooters, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
RADIE v. LYFT, INC. et al
as 2:2023cv04507
Plaintiff:
MELISSA RADIE
Defendant:
LYFT, INC. and PROGRESSIVE DIRECT INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
BRADLEY v. LYFT, INC. et al
as 2:2023cv04342
Plaintiff:
JERRELL BRADLEY
Defendant:
LYFT, INC., CRAIG BROWN, JR. and JOHN DOES 1-4
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Mendy v. Rasier LLC et al
as 2:2023cv01470
Plaintiff:
Sang W. Mendy and Sang W Mendy
Defendant:
Rasier, LLC, Uber Technologies, Inc., Lyft, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Breach of Contract
Brooks v. C.B., LLC et al
as 3:2023cv01328
Plaintiff:
John Brooks
Defendant:
C.B., LLC doing business as Reggie's Bar, Reggie's Bar, Darin P. Adams and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Fare Technologies LLC v. Lyft, Inc.
as 5:2023cv04935
Plaintiff:
FARE TECHNOLOGIES LLC
Defendant:
Lyft, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Verdin v. Lyft, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv12037
Plaintiff:
Daniel Verdin
Defendant:
Lyft, Inc. and Genli Pimentel Eusebio
Not Classified By Court:
Judge Marianne B. Bowler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
