Cases 41 - 50 of 53
Robinson v. State of Alabama
as 1:2013cv00553
Petitioner:
Steven Maurice Robinson
Respondent:
Carter Davenport
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Vincent Robinson v. Secretary, Florida Department, et al
as 13-10447
Petitioner - Appellant:
VINCENT MAURICE ROBINSON
Respondent - Appellee:
SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv01528
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Robinson v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 8:2011cv02404
Petitioner:
Vincent Maurice Robinson
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections and Attorney General, State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
US v. Kevin Robinson
as 11-4548
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
KEVIN MAURICE ROBINSON
Robinson v. Baptist Memorial Hospital et al
as 2:2010cv02701
Plaintiff:
Maurice Robinson
Defendant:
Baptist Memorial Hospital and Medical Alternatives
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
ROBINSON v. SOBINA et al
as 4:2010cv01985
Respondent:
Raymond J. Sobina and The attorney general of the state of pa
Petitioner:
Mark Maurice Robinson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
ROBINSON v. SOBINA et al
as 1:2010cv00209
Respondent:
RAYMOND J. SOBINA and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PA
Petitioner:
MARK MAURICE ROBINSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Robinson v. Minneapolis, City of et al
as 0:2010cv03067
Plaintiff:
Darryl Maurice Robinson
Defendant:
Minneapolis, City of, Mark Lanasa, James Archer and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Maurice Robinson v. Kimberly Taylor
as 08-6542
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MAURICE ROBINSON
Defendant - Appellee:
KIMBERLY S. TAYLOR, Superior Court Judge, MICHELLE WALKER, Assistant District Attorney and KAREN S. BIERNACKI, Assistant District Attorney
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
