Cases 41 - 50 of 2,289
Zelesnik v. McConnell et al
as 2:2024cv00010
Plaintiff:
Paula Zelesnik
Defendant:
Senator Mitch McConnell and Ford Motor Co.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-1050
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
McConnell v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration et al
as 5:2023cv01202
Plaintiff:
Heather McConnell
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Malone v. Sup of Grievance
as 23-40713
Plaintiff:
Frederick Dewayne Malone
Defendant:
Supervisor of Grievance, McConnell Unit, Sergeant Ms. Martinez and Assistant Warden Samaniego Placido, Jr.
Hope v. Brady et al
as 7:2023cv01677
Plaintiff:
Antonio DeVonne Hope, Sr
Defendant:
James Brady, Cecilia Quirindongo, Victoria Ann Valentine and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Melons (PS) v. McConnell
as 1:2023cv03247
Plaintiff:
Troy Melons
Defendant:
Megan Rachel McConnell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Schore et al v. McConnell
as 3:2023cv00057
Plaintiff:
Joseph Schore and Elliot Schore
Defendant:
Raymond McConnell, Raymond H. McConnell and The Heirs of Lillian McConnell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition to Quiet Title
McGill et al v. Xponential Fitness LLC et al
as 2:2023cv03909
Plaintiff:
Shannon McGill, Gina Oliveira, Justin Curry and others
Defendant:
Xponential Fitness LLC, XPOF Assetco, LLC, AKT Franchise, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Arron Adams v. USA, et al
as 23-13601
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ARRON ADAMS
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, CHRIS MCCONNELL and FCI POLLOCK WARDEN
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv05320
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
