Cases 41 - 50 of 114
Campbell v. Thomas, et al. (INMATE 2)
as 2:2014cv00460
Plaintiff:
Michael William Campbell
Defendant:
Kim Tobias Thomas and Christopher Gordy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kurt Ponzar v. Matthew Layfield, et al
as 14-1494
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Kurt W. Ponzar
Plaintiff:
Sandra L. Ponzar
Defendant - Appellee:
Matthew S. Layfield, Polsinelli Shughart, P.C., Michelle Clardy and others
Campbell et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv34061
Plaintiff:
Charlotte L. Campbell and Michael W. Campbell
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc., Ethicon, LLC and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Campbell v. Workman
as 13-6298
Petitioner - Appellant:
MICHAEL A. CAMPBELL
Respondent - Appellee:
TERRY MARTIN
Campbell v. Oklahoma County District Court et al
as 5:2013cv01187
Plaintiff:
Michael A Campbell
Defendant:
Oklahoma County District Court, Virgil Black, Oklahoma County District Attorney's Office and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Campbell v. Jones et al
as 5:2013cv00926
Plaintiff:
Michael A Campbell
Defendant:
Justin Jones, Oklahoma Board of Corrections Members, Genese McCoy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Campbell v. USA
as 1:2013cv00529
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Michael Wayne Campbell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Campbell v. USA
as 1:2013cv00528
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Michael Wayne Campbell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Campbell et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv09405
Plaintiff:
Theresa M. Campbell and Michael E. Campbell
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc., Ethicon, LLC and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Pittman v. Suffolk County P.D. H. A 5th Precient et al
as 2:2013cv02462
Defendant:
Michael L. Campbell, Adam R. Friedlander, Robert E. Landgrover and others
Plaintiff:
Joseph Pittman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.