Cases 41 - 50 of 79
Goodvine v. Litscher et al
as 1:2017cv01223
Plaintiff:
Christopher Goodvine
Defendant:
Jon Litscher , Cathy Jess , Jim Schwochert and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
as 14-1335
Amicus Curiae:
CARROLL GANTZ, RALPH D. CLIFFORD, JOSEPH M. BALLAY and others
Defendant / Appellant:
SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC., a New York corporation, SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., a Korean corporation and SAMSUNG TELECOMMUNICATIONS AMERICA, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company
Plaintiff / Appellee:
APPLE INC., a California Corporation
Custom Dynamics, LLC v. Schultz
as 5:2017cv00130
Plaintiff:
Custom Dynamics, LLC
Defendant:
Michael Schultz
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
Lindsey v. Recla et al
as 2:2017cv00335
Plaintiff:
Leighton D Lindsey
Defendant:
Whitney Recla, Stephanie Wijas, Michael Schultz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
King v. Eckstein et al
as 2:2017cv00205
Plaintiff:
Aerion C King
Defendant:
Scott Eckstein , John Kind, Michael Schultz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
King v. Litscher et al
as 2:2017cv00201
Plaintiff:
Aerion C King
Defendant:
Jon Litscher , Cathy Jess, Scott Eckstein and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kristopher Reveles v. County of Ventura et al
as 2:2017cv01066
Defendant:
County of Ventura, Geoff Dean, Does and others
Plaintiff:
Kristopher R. Reveles
Schultz v. Hill
as 2:2016cv02071
Defendant:
Dawn Marie Hill
Plaintiff:
Lee Michael Schultz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Golden v. Fullmer et al
as 2:2016cv01162
Plaintiff:
Parish M Golden
Defendant:
Luke Fullmer , Larry Dillenberg, Benjamin Giffin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kretlow, Bernard v. Schultz, Michael et al
as 3:2016cv00583
Plaintiff:
Bernard Edward Kretlow
Defendant:
Michael Schultz , Elsinger , Baumann and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
