Cases 41 - 50 of 79
Ruiz et al v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as 2:2014cv00583
Plaintiff:
Pamela Ruiz , Deborah Fairbanks , Lovina Serbus and others
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson, Ethicon, Inc. , Ethicon, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Pamela Ruiz et al v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as CAC/2:13-cv-06289
Plaintiff:
Pamela Ruiz , Deborah Fairbanks , Lovina Serbus and others
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson , Ethicon Inc , Ethicon LLC and others
Pamela Ruiz et al v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as 2:2013cv06289
Plaintiff:
Cynthia Baker, Freda Barnes, Joni Berkebile and others
Defendant:
Does, Ethicon Inc, Ethicon LLC and others
Taylor v. James et al
as 6:2013cv00263
Defendant:
Lt. FNU James, Tammy Phillips and Christel Scypion
Plaintiff:
Rene Michelle Taylor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carlos Foxx v. Michelle Taylor, et al
as 13-60559
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CARLOS DEWAYNE FOXX
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHELLE TAYLOR and MRS. HINDS, Case Manager
Williamson v. Westby, et al
as 13-3044
Debtor - Debtor:
In the Matter of: DUSTIN JAY WESTBY and BRANDI MICHELLE WESTBY
Appellant:
DARCY D. WILLIAMSON
Appellee:
DUSTIN JAY WESTBY and BRANDI MICHELLE WESTBY, AKA Brandi Michelle Castro, AKA Brandi Michelle Taylor
Intervenor - Appellee:
DEREK SCHMIDT
Foxx v. Taylor et al
as 3:2013cv00074
Plaintiff:
Carlos Dewayne Foxx
Defendant:
Michelle Taylor and Mrs. Hinds
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Taylor et al v. Myles et al
as 3:2013cv00035
Respondent:
Carolyn Myles and Hon. Brian Sandoval
Petitioner:
Michelle Taylor
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Herring v. Epps, et al
as 3:2013cv00016
Plaintiff:
John B. Herring
Defendant:
Christopher B. Epps and Michelle Taylor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bale v. Taylor
as 3:2012cv05803
Plaintiff:
John Michael Bale
Defendant:
Michelle Taylor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
