Cases 41 - 50 of 214
LEAHY v. I-FLOW CORPORATION et al
as 3:2011cv00976
Plaintiff:
DAN LEAHY
Defendant:
I-FLOW CORPORATION , STRYKER CORPORATION, STRYKER SALES CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Welke et al v. Moog Inc
as 1:2011cv00063
Defendant:
Moog Inc and ABC Insurance Company
Plaintiff:
Brian R Welke and Martina M Welke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Sowards et al v. I-Flow Corporation et al
as 3:2011cv00025
Plaintiff:
Mark A. Sowards and Judy K. Sowards
Defendant:
I-Flow Corporation , DJO, LLC , DJO Incorporated and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Brenda McIntire v. Stryker Corporation et al
as 8:2010cv01948
Defendant:
Curlin Medical Inc, Does, McKinley Medical LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Brenda McIntire
Main Hastings LLC v. Moog, Inc.
as 2:2010cv00552
Plaintiff:
Main Hastings LLC
Defendant:
Moog, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729
EVANS v. I-FLOW CORPORATION et al
as 3:2010cv06421
Plaintiff:
GEORGE EVANS
Defendant:
I-FLOW CORPORATION , STRYKER CORPORATION, STRYKER SALES CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Maynard et al v. McKinley Medical, LLC et al
as 1:2010cv00982
Plaintiff:
Brettney Maynard and Matthew Maynard
Defendant:
McKinley Medical, LLC, Moog, Inc. and Curlin Medical, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Dufresne v. DJO, L.L.C. et al
as 1:2010cv12084
Plaintiff:
Daniel A. Dufresne, II
Defendant:
DJO, L.L.C. , DJO, Incorporated , I-Flow Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 pip
Thurness et al v. DJO, L.L.C. et al
as 4:2010cv00562
Plaintiff:
Shelly Thurness , Brent Thurness, Cole Thurness and others
Defendant:
DJO, L.L.C., DJO, Inc., Incorporated DJO and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Burns v. Breg, Inc. et al
as 1:2010cv07373
Plaintiff:
Robert J. Burns
Defendant:
I-Flow Corporation , DJO, LLC , McKinley Medical LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 02 U.S.C. § 431
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
