Cases 41 - 50 of 65
Raimer v. Montgomery County Hospital District et al
as 4:2017cv01258
Plaintiff:
Sandra Raimer
Defendant:
Montgomery County Hospital District , Randy Johnson , Melissa Miller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Miller et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv15519
Plaintiff:
Melissa Miller and Douglas Miller
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jeremy Reed et al v. USPLabs, LLC et al
as 2:2015cv03281
Plaintiff:
Dan Anderson, Timothy Anderson, Jonathan Asahi and others
Defendant:
Does, Jonathan Vincent Doyle, GNC Corporation and others
An Individual:
Jacob Geissler
Miller v. Social Security, Commissioner of
as 2:2015cv11345
Plaintiff:
Monica Melissa Miller
Defendant:
Social Security, Commissioner of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Kee et al v. Axiall Corp
as 2:2015cv00298
Plaintiff:
Lisa Kee , George Kelly, Jr , Lindsey Pickett and others
Defendant:
Axiall Corp
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Miller v. Convergent Outsourcing, Inc.
as 1:2014cv00508
Plaintiff:
Melissa Miller
Defendant:
Convergent Outsourcing, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2014cv00116
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1693
Reed et al v. USPLABS, LLC et al
as CAS/3:13-cv-03135
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Reed , Timothy Anderson , Dan Anderson and others
Defendant:
USPLABS, LLC , Jonathan Vincent Doyle , Jacob Geissler and others
Reed et al v. USPLABS, LLC et al
as 3:2013cv03135
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Reed , Timothy Anderson , Dan Anderson and others
Defendant:
USPLABS, LLC , Jonathan Vincent Doyle , Jacob Geissler and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0045
Miller et al v. Americollect, Incorporated
as 1:2013cv00493
Plaintiff:
Daniel Miller and Melissa Miller
Defendant:
Americollect Inc
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
