Cases 41 - 50 of 252
Cohen et al v. hughes et al
as 1:2021cv00601
Plaintiff:
Daniel Cohen and david cohen
Defendant:
duane hughes, Steve schrader, Robert Willison and others
(PS) Spearman v. Towing et al
as 2:2021cv01288
Defendant:
Jill N. Wood, Hanna Boyce, Victoria Chavez and others
Plaintiff:
Reginald Edward Spearman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CLARK v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv30479
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL ROBERT CLARK
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
(PC) Spearman v. Sam Berri Towing et al
as 2:2021cv01214
Plaintiff:
Reginald E. Spearman and Reginald Edward Spearman
Defendant:
Sam Berri Towing, Cameron Hayne, Jill Woodman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
David Brown et al v. Duane A. Hughes et al
as 2:2021cv04412
Defendant:
Duane A. Hughes, Workhorse Group Inc., Stephen Fleming and others
Plaintiff:
David Brown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Mark Kistenmacher v. Duane A. Hughes et al
as 2:2021cv04294
Defendant:
Duane A. Hughes, Pamela S. Mader, Workhorse Group Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Mark Kistenmacher
Barry Caruso v. Duane A. Hughes, et al
as 2:2021cv04202
Defendant:
Jacqueline Dedo, Harry DeMott, H. Benjamin Samuels and others
Plaintiff:
Barry Caruso
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Mark Kistenmacher and David Brown
Michael Pietila v. Keith Immerfall, et al
as 21-1751
Defendant / Appellee:
ANN YORK, PATRICK GORMAN, MICHAEL A. CLARK and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL S. PIETILA
MCCARY v. CLARK
as 2:2021cv00340
Petitioner:
MICHAEL LA SHAWN MCCARY
Respondent:
CCPM MICHAEL R. CLARK
Defendant:
JOSH SHAPIRO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv00903
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Consolidated Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
