Cases 41 - 50 of 143
Whitlock v. Men's Addiction Recovery Campus et al
as 1:2018cv00066
Plaintiff:
Harrison P. Whitlock
Defendant:
Men's Addiction Recovery Campus and Michael Todd Baker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sears v. Baker et al
as 1:2018cv21837
Plaintiff:
Terry Eugene Sears
Defendant:
Michael A. Baker, Lawanda E. Townsend, Jose L. Masso Marino and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Michael Baker v. Bruce Armstrong, et al
as 18-50334
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL ALLEN BAKER
Defendant - Appellee:
BRUCE ARMSTRONG, TDCJ-CID, RICK THALER and others
Baker v. Paez Eatery West, Inc. et al
as 0:2018cv60795
Defendant:
Paez Eatery West, Inc., Omar Paez and Paez Eatery West, Inc. doing business as Enzos
Plaintiff:
Michael Robert Baker
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201
Eddy et al v. Federal Home Loan Morgage Corporation et al
as 2:2018cv00400
Plaintiff:
Mark Eddy and Bobbie Eddy
Defendant:
Federal Home Loan Morgage Corporation , Bank of America N.A. and Michael M. Baker
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881
Baker v. Synchrony Bank
as 2:2018cv10615
Defendant:
Synchrony Bank
Plaintiff:
Michael P. Baker
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Cottman et al v. Naskrent et al
as 2:2017cv02045
Plaintiff:
Robert P Cottman , Michael A Baker and Daniel L Theobald
Defendant:
David G Naskrent , Matthew J Surma , Corrina Surma and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Baker v. Shartle
as 4:2017cv00221
Petitioner:
Michael Paul Baker
Respondent:
John T Shartle
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Washington v. Pierce et al
as 1:2016cv09880
Plaintiff:
Frances V. Washington
Defendant:
Kory O. Pierce, Patrick P. Soraghan, Charles J. Barango and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Swindall V. Baker
as 1:2016cv01155
Respondent:
Michael P. Baker
Movant:
Families Civil Liberties Union
Petitioner:
Erika C. Swindall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - 42:1983 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
