Cases 41 - 50 of 61
Berry et al v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2015cv12792
Plaintiff:
Ruby Janice Berry and Michael Berry
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Berry v. Janssen Research & Development, LLC et al
as 2:2015cv03732
Plaintiff:
Michael Berry
Defendant:
Janssen Research & Development LLC, Janssen Ortho, LLC, Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Berry v. Right Choice Staffing Group LLC et al
as 2:2015cv11937
Plaintiff:
Michael Berry
Defendant:
Right Choice Staffing Group LLC, Vascor LTD, Autoline Transportation, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Berry v. Kior, Inc. et al
as 4:2013cv02443
Plaintiff:
Michael Berry
Defendant:
Kior, Inc., Fred Cannon and John K. Karnes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Berry et al v. Cannon et al
as 4:2015cv00012
Plaintiff:
Michael Berry , Dave Carlton and Sharon Kegerreis
Defendant:
Fred Cannon , John K. Karnes and Vinod Khosla
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Wiltz v. Moundbuilders Guidance Center et al
as 2:2013cv00523
Plaintiff:
Cassandra R Wiltz
Defendant:
Moundbuilders Guidance Center, Behavioral Health Care Partners, Inc., Forman and Associates Consulting and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Berry v. United States of America
as 1:2012cv09859
Defendant:
United States of America
Plaintiff:
Michael Berry
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
Harris v. Berry et al
as 2:2012cv00260
Plaintiff:
Mark Chapman Harris
Defendant:
Michael Berry, Warren Silberman, Stephen Goodman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harris v. Harper et al
as 1:2012cv02730
Plaintiff:
Mark Chapman Harris
Defendant:
Charles Harper, John Doyle , Jermome Babbitt and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Berry v. Autozone Inc
as 2:2012cv00084
Plaintiff:
Michael Berry
Defendant:
AutoZone Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
