Cases 41 - 50 of 83
Craig Lyznick et al v. Lumber Liquidators, Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv02817
Defendant:
Building Health Check, LLC, Does, Lumber Liquidators, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Shari Collins, Patricia Cottington, Craig Lyznick and others
May v. Syngenta Corporation et al
as MN/0:15-cv-00973
Plaintiff:
Michael May
Defendant:
Syngenta Corporation , Syngenta Seeds, Inc. , Syngenta Biotechnology, Inc. and others
May v. Syngenta Corporation et al
as 0:2015cv00973
Plaintiff:
Michael May
Defendant:
Syngenta Corporation , Syngenta Seeds, Inc. , Syngenta Biotechnology, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
May v. Morgan Advanced Materials PLC
as 1:2015cv00181
Plaintiff:
Michael May
Defendant:
Morgan Advanced Materials PLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Anderson v. The City of Graysville, Tennessee et al
as 1:2014cv00347
Plaintiff:
Rick Anderson
Defendant:
The City of Graysville, Tennessee, Vice Mayor Denesa Reel , Commissioner Michael May and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Mays v. Life Insurance Company of North America
as 5:2014cv02115
Plaintiff:
Michael Mays
Defendant:
Life Insurance Company of North America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Cheatham et al v. Thomas et al
as 4:2014cv01952
Plaintiff:
Antonio Cheatham , Mark Duke , James Edwards and others
Defendant:
Kim Thomas , James Deloach , Terrance McDonnell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv00245
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mays v. Davenport et al
as 4:2014cv00808
Plaintiff:
Michael Mays
Defendant:
Carter Davenport, Robert Bentley, Kim Thomas and others
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney 3
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CASE NUMBER NOT USED
as 2:2014cv00492
Plaintiff:
Michael Mays and Belinda Mays
Defendant:
Pierce County, Paul Pastor, Pierce County Sheriff's Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
