Cases 41 - 50 of 50
Tyler v. Varano
as 1:2012cv01203
Petitioner:
Michael Tyler
Respondent:
David A. Varano and PA State Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Tyler v. United States of America
as 4:2012cv00342
Petitioner:
Loren Michael Tyler
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Juston-Michael Potts v. James Walker
as 11-17987
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JUSTON-MICHAEL TYLER POTTS
Defendant - Appellee:
JAMES WALKER
FSMP IP LLC v. Babauta et al
as 1:2011cv06820
Plaintiff:
FSMP IP LLC
Defendant:
Felix Babauta, Jr. and Michael Tyler, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051
BARNWELL et al v. GLAXOSMITHKLINE LLC
as 2:2010cv06293
Plaintiff:
WORTH BARNWELL , BRETT HENNING , ISABELLE JOHNSON and others
Defendant:
GLAXOSMITHKLINE LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Lohman v Tyler et al
as 1:2010cv00249
Plaintiff:
M D Lohman
Defendant:
Michael Tyler and Adobe Auto Sales, LLC
Thirdparty_defendant:
United States of America and United States Marshals Service
Thirdparty_plaintiff:
Michael Tyler and Adobe Auto Sales, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Potts v. Walker
as 5:2009cv05849
Plaintiff:
Justin-Michael Tyler Potts
Defendant:
James Walker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2009cv00456
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Tyler v. United States of America
as 2:2009cv00368
Petitioner:
Michael Tyler
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Motorists Mutual Insurance Company v. Frazier et al
as 3:2008cv01211
Plaintiff:
Motorists Mutual Insurance Company
Defendant:
Bobby Frazier, Charles L. Hardwick, Thomas Reno Hardwick and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
