Cases 41 - 50 of 50
Roberts v. Directors et al
as 3:2017cv00515
Defendant:
Unknown Administratives, Mr. Travis Day, Unknown Directors and others
Plaintiff:
Charles Owens Roberts
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jason R. Garza v. Life Insurance Company of North America
as 5:2015cv02436
Plaintiff:
Mr. Jason R Garza
Defendant:
Life Insurance Company of North America
Dickson v. U.S. Department of Justice Attorney General of the U.S.A. Mrs. Loretta E. Lynch et al
as 4:2015cv00121
Plaintiff:
John M. Dickson, Jr.
Defendant:
U.S. Department of Justice Attorney General of the U.S.A. Mrs. Loretta E. Lynch, Mr. Eric Holder Former Attorney General of the U.S.A. of Covington & Burling LLP, U.S. Dept of Justice U.S. Attorney Eastern District, Virginia Mr. Dana J. Boente and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
Jason Parker v. Brad Momme, et al
as 15-3143
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MR. JASON PARKER
Defendant - Appellee:
PHIL. POLICE OFFICER BRAD MOMME, #7631, DAVID O'CONNOR, CHARLES RAMSEY, Phila. Police Chief and others
BARNES v. COLEMAN et al
as 2:2012cv00702
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY BARNES
Defendant:
BRIAN E. COLEMAN, GARTH WALLS, ERIC T. ARMEL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Singletary v. GEO Corporation et al
as 1:2010cv03589
Defendant:
GEO Corporation, Mr. Jason Mattia and Dr. Tupoux
Plaintiff:
Thomas Singletary
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Marshall v. Whitlock et al
as 3:2010cv00098
Plaintiff:
Michael Nicholas Marshall
Defendant:
Steve Whitlock, Ms Gates, Mr Jason and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Marshall v. Whitlock et al
as 5:2010cv00274
Plaintiff:
Michael Nicholas Marshall
Defendant:
Steve Whitlock, Ms Gates, Mr Jason and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MM Compound, Inc. v. Jason Trosper et al
as 2:2010cv01444
Defendant:
Cowboy Militia, LLC, Does and Mr. Jason Trosper
Plaintiff:
MM Compound, Inc. and Metal Mulisha, LLC
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
