Cases 41 - 50 of 121
Champan Washington v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
as 17-56457
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHAMPAN R. WASHINGTON
Defendant - Appellee:
WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., successor by merger with Wachovia Mortage, FSB
Patrick Ghosh v. Gregory David, et al
as 17-10844
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PATRICK ARVIND GHOSH
Defendant - Appellee:
GREGORY S. DAVID, Warden, TIMOTHY R. WASHINGTON, Captain, GLEN D. STOUDER, Unit Grievance Investigator and others
Washington v. Bio-Medical Applications of Alabama, Inc.
as 2:2017cv00518
Plaintiff:
Mae R. Washington
Defendant:
Bio-Medical Applications of Alabama, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Mardie L. Washington et al v. Wells Fargo Bank National Association et al
as 5:2017cv01279
Defendant:
Cal-Western Reconveyance, LLC, Does and Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
Plaintiff:
Deborah R. Washington and Mardie L. Washington
Washington v. Social Security Administration
as 4:2017cv00191
Plaintiff:
Sandra R Washington
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv00170
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Washington v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
as 1:2017cv00065
Plaintiff:
Regina R Washington
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402
George Washington, Jr. v. Beatrice Jokines, et al
as 17-1238
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GEORGE R. WASHINGTON, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
BEATRICE D. JOKINES, SHELLY WASHINGTON, JOHN DOE, #1 and others
Champan R. Washington v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. et al
as 5:2017cv00054
Defendant:
Does and Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
Plaintiff:
Champan R. Washington
Washington v. Jokines et al
as 1:2016cv09656
Plaintiff:
George R. Washington, Jr.
Defendant:
Beatrice D. Jokines, Shelly Washington, John Doe #1 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
