Cases 41 - 50 of 124
Davis, Jr. v. Werlich
as 3:2019cv00298
Respondent:
T.G. Werlich
Petitioner:
Ray Allen Davis, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv01862
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd
United States of America v. Burrell (Allen)
as 18-1880
Appellee USA:
United States of America
Defendant:
Nico Burrell, AKA Zico Nico, Douglas McLarty, AKA Q-Don, AKA Q-Dizzy, Martin Mitchell, AKA Tyliek and others
Defendant - Appellant:
Carletto Allen, AKA Joker
BMO Harris Bank, N.A. v. Perrin
as 4:2018cv00362
Plaintiff:
BMO Harris Bank, N.A.
Defendant:
Ray Allen Perrin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Eugene Phillips, III v. Consolidated Publishing Co., et al
as 17-13119
Plaintiff - Appellant:
EUGENE DEBBS PHILLIPS, III
Defendant - Appellee:
CONSOLIDATED PUBLISHING COMPANY, INC., PUBLIX SUPER MARKETS, INC., CARLTON FIELDS, P.A. and others
US v. Ray Dicks, Jr.
as 17-6876
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
RAY ALLEN DICKS, JR.
United States of America v. Burrell (Dasilva)
as 17-1693
Appellee USA:
United States of America
Defendant:
Nico Burrell, AKA Zico Nico, Douglas McLarty, AKA Q-Don, AKA Q-Dizzy, Martin Mitchell, AKA Tyliek and others
Defendant - Appellant:
Oneil Dasilva, AKA Soxx, AKA Bobby Soxx and Robert Haughton, AKA Duke
United States of America v. Burrell (Haughton)
as 17-1140
Appellee USA:
United States of America
Defendant:
Nico Burwell, AKA Zico Nico, Douglas McLarty, AKA Q-Don, AKA Q-Dizzy, Martin Mitchell, AKA Tyliek and others
Defendant - Appellant:
Robert Haughton, AKA Duke
Donald Allen v. Darrel Vannoy, Warden
as 17-30183
Petitioner - Appellant:
DONALD RAY ALLEN
Respondent - Appellee:
DARREL VANNOY, WARDEN, LOUISIANA STATE PENITENTIARY
Allen v. Rahming (INMATE 2)
as 2:2017cv00108
Plaintiff:
Walter Ray Allen
Defendant:
Wilcott Rahming
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
