Cases 41 - 49 of 49
Minton et al v. Pfizer Inc et al
as 2:2010cv03009
Plaintiff:
Rebecca Lee Minton , Plaintiffs' Liaison Counsel and Plaintiffs' Lead Counsel
Defendant:
Pfizer Inc, Defendant's Liaison Counsel and Defendant's Lead Counsel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bannister v. Commissioner SSA
as 5:2010cv00188
Plaintiff:
Rebecca Lee Bannister
Defendant:
Commissioner SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
McKown et al v. Norstar Office Products, Inc.
as 1:2010cv01255
Plaintiff:
Arthur Blake McKown and Rebecca Lee McKown
Defendant:
Norstar Office Products, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lee et al v. Leviev Fulton Club, LLC. et al
as 1:2010cv05920
Plaintiff:
Rebecca Lee and John Keun Sang Lee
Defendant:
Leviev Fulton Club, LLC., Fulton Club, LLC and Al Fulton, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
GRAHAM v. ASTRUE
as 1:2009cv00260
Plaintiff:
REBECCA LEE GRAHAM
Defendant:
MICHAEL J ASTRUE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Champagne et al v. Hilcorp Energy Co et al
as 6:2009cv01971
Defendant:
Hilcorp Energy Co, Devon Energy Production Co L P, Chevron Corp and others
Plaintiff:
Mary Jane Carol Trahan Champagne, Robert E Trahan, Annette Trahan Leblanc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
IN RE: FAILURE TO COMPLY
as 1:2009mc00077
In Re:
IN THE MATTER OF FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH CONTINUING LEGAL EDUCATION REQUIREMENTS AND/OR NONPAYMENT OF ATTORNEY REGISTRATION FEES
Respondent:
DAWN DESIREE CUMMINGS, FAZIA DEEN-BACCHUS, LISA MARIE DIRIG and others
McPeeks v. Washington
as 1:2008cv00108
Petitioner:
Rebecca Lee McPeeks
Respondent:
V. Washington
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Carballo et al v. Pfizer, Inc. et al
as 3:2007cv03646
Plaintiff:
Rachel Carballo, Rachel Carballo, Rachel Carballo and others
Defendant:
Pfizer, Inc., Pharmacia Corporation, G.D. Searle LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
