Cases 41 - 50 of 54
Taylor v. Domino et al
as 1:2015cv09741
Plaintiff:
Dexter Taylor, Jr.
Defendant:
Malcolm Domino, Michael Shepard, Department of Streets and Sanitation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Brickey v. Beals et al
as 1:2015cv01344
Plaintiff:
Angelique Brickey
Defendant:
Stefanie Beals, Peggy Pimentel, Robert Sharpe and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Motorola Inc. v. Pick
as 2:2014ms00071
Defendant:
C. Donnelly Communications, Inc., Covert Services, Inc., Todd Davis and others
Plaintiff:
Motorola Inc.
FOUCH v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA et al
as 1:2012cv01291
Plaintiff:
GREGORY FOUCH
Defendant:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA , ALBERT SCOTT and ROBERT SHARPE
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 8101
SHARP v. THE PHILADELPHIA PRISON SYSTEM
as 2:2012cv02812
Plaintiff:
ROBERT SHARP
Defendant:
THE PHILADELPHIA PRISON SYSTEM
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bentley et al v. Langguth et al
as 1:2012cv00250
Plaintiff:
Caryll Bentley, Allan Chase, Mitchell Clifton and others
Defendant:
Equity Trust Company, Claudia Lee Langguth and Robert Roland Langguth
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 - Diversity: Securities Fraud
Sharp v. Singer et al
as 4:2011cv01333
Plaintiff:
Robert Sharp
Defendant:
Susan Singer , Charles Bryson , Gene Stubblefield and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SHARP et al v. MAIN LINE HEALTHCARE
as 2:2010cv03600
Plaintiff:
ROBERT SHARP and DIANE SHARP
Defendant:
MAIN LINE HEALTHCARE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SHARP et al v. NOONE et al
as 2:2010cv01712
Plaintiff:
ROBERT SHARP and DIANE SHARP
Defendant:
ROBERT NOONE, MAIN LINE SURGEONS, LTD., LANKENAU HOSPITAL and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Blake Joseph v. Cindi Curtin, et al
as 09-1616
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BLAKE JOSEPH
Defendant - Appellee:
CINDI S. CURTIN, Warden, ROBERT SHARP, Assistant Deputy Warden, sued in both capacities, MIKE HASKE, Resident Unit Manager, in both capacities and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
