Cases 41 - 50 of 674
Turner et al v. County of Washoe et al
as 3:2023cv00407
Plaintiff:
Kera Turner and Joseph Turner
Defendant:
County of Washoe, Ashley Davis, Natasha Eagan-Ambos and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lifschitz v. Reata Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv07481
Plaintiff:
Phil Lifschitz
Defendant:
Reata Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Martin W. Edwards, R. Kent McGaughy, Jr. and others
Stine v. Coyle et al
as 4:2023cv00321
Plaintiff:
Mikeal Glenn Stine
Defendant:
J Coyle, S Karlan, E Alcantar and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
RUFF v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2023cv02450
Plaintiff:
BOBBIE DEANNA RUFF
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
(PC) Cooper v. Shaffer et al
as 2:2023cv01737
Plaintiff:
Michael Dean Cooper
Defendant:
Jennifer P. Shaffer, Michael Ruff, Minerva De'La and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davis v. Skillen et al
as 1:2023cv00091
Plaintiff:
Kevin Davis
Defendant:
Shane Skillen, Jason Ruff, Tyrel Flammang and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ruff v. Warden T. Wallace
as 9:2023cv02854
Petitioner:
Eddie Ruff and Eddie J Ruff,
Respondent:
Warden T. Wallace
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Anthony Kelly v. City of Alexandria
as 23-1752
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANTHONY KELLY, GREGORY COOK, GERALD FAIR and others
Defendant / Appellee:
THE CITY OF ALEXANDRIA
RUFF v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2023cv19465
Plaintiff:
JOSH RUFF
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Alexander Ruff v. Kevin Mazza
as 23-5532
Petitioner / Appellant:
ALEXANDER LEE RUFF
Respondent / Appellee:
KEVIN MAZZA, Kevin Mazza, Warden, Northpoint Training Center and KEVIN MAZZA, Warden, Northpoint Training Center
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
