Cases 41 - 50 of 76
Great American Assurance Company v. Stroud's Lane Farm, LLC
as 5:2016cv00546
Plaintiff:
Great American Assurance Company
Defendant:
Stroud's Lane Farm, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ice Services LLC v. Regal Marketing, Inc et al
as 2:2016cv02780
Plaintiff:
Ice Services LLC
Defendant:
Gregory S Lane, Regal Marketing, Inc, Regal Marketing, LLC and others
Reliance Communications, LLC v. Regal Marketing, Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv01721
Defendant:
Charles M. Lane, Gregory S. Lane and Regal Marketing, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Reliance Communications, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Default
Lane et al v. Brightview Senior Living, LLC
as 1:2015cv02319
Plaintiff:
Jessica S. Lane and Maria L. Simons
Defendant:
Brightview Senior Living, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 206
105 Mt. Kisco Associates LLC et, al v. Paul Carozza et, al
as 7:2015cv05346
Defendant:
Paul Carozza, Richard's Lumber & Building Materials Center, Inc., Canrad-Honovia, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
105 Mt. Kisco Associates LLC , Amanda's Lane LLC and Mark Stagg
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 9601
105 Mt. Kisco Associates LLC v Paul Carozza et al
as 7:2015cv05343
Plaintiff:
105 Mt. Kisco Associates LLC
Defendant:
Amanda's Lane LLC, Mark Stagg, Paul Carozza and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 9601
Cathy Toole v. Barack Obama, et al
as 15-60093
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CATHY L. TOOLE
Defendant - Appellee:
BARACK OBAMA, President, JOHN ROBERTS, Chief Judge, LOUIS GUIROLA, JR., U.S. Magistrate Judge, Judge and others
Ravanna Spencer, et al v. Michael Wenerowicz, et al
as 14-4669
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RAVANNA SPENCER
Plaintiff - Appellee:
JAMES HERMAN
Defendant - Appellee:
SUPERINTENDENT MICHAEL WENEROWICZ, DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT L. S. LANE, CCPM OLINGER and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2014cv02304
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12117
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
