Cases
Cases 41 - 50 of 738
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv03041
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv02920
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00910
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Axley v. Moskovko et al
as 2:2023cv01441
Plaintiff: Amanda Beth-Lynn Axley
Defendant: Seva Moskovko, Terri Schrader and Bobby Carpenter
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
United African-Asian Abilities Club et al v. 1611 Schrader Apartments LLC et al
as 2:2023cv05776
Plaintiff: United African-Asian Abilities Club, On Behalf Of Itself And Its Members, James Lee and United African-Asian Abilities Club
Defendant: 1611 SCHRADER APARTMENTS LLC, DOES 1 through 10, inclusive, and Does 1 through 10, Inclusive
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Fair Housing Act
Schrader Cellars, LLC v. Robert Roach, Jr.
as 23-15990
Appellant: SCHRADER CELLARS, LLC
Counter Claimant: ROBERT M. ROACH, Jr.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv05934
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv11554
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv05259
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 9:2023cv00107
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?