Cases
Cases 41 - 50 of 53
Rohn, et al v. Dana Farber/Harvard Cancer Cen, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 11-1329
Plaintiff - Appellant: AUDREY ROHN, individually and as executrix of the estate of Dennis Rohn, BARBARA SENSING and VALERIE SAMSELL
Plaintiff: MILTON GREENE, CROSSROADS ACQUISITION CORP, WILLIAM M. PORTER and others
Defendant: TAP PHARMACEUTICAL PRODUCTS, INC., ABBOTT LABORATORIES and TAKEDA PHARMACEUTICAL COMPANY, LIMITED
Interested Party - Appellee: DANA FARBER/HARVARD CANCER CENTER, STATE OF IDAHO, STATE OF ILLINOIS and others
Interested Party: SOUTHEASTERN UROLOGICAL CENTER, P.A., KLINE & SPECTER GROUP and KLINE & SPECTER, PC
Type: Other Statutes RICO
Rohn, et al v. TAP Pharmaceutical Products, I, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 10-2494
Plaintiff - Appellee: MILTON GREENE, WILLIAM M. PORTER, LIBERTY NATIONAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY and others
Plaintiff - Appellant: AUDREY ROHN, individually and as executrix of the estate of Dennis Rohn, BARBARA SENSING and VALERIE SAMSELL
Interested Party - Appellee: STATE OF IDAHO, STATE OF ILLINOIS, STATE OF KENTUCKY and others
Defendant - Appellee: TAP PHARMACEUTICAL PRODUCTS, INC., ABBOTT LABORATORIES and TAKEDA PHARMACEUTICAL COMPANY, LIMITED
Interested Party: SOUTHEASTERN UROLOGICAL CENTER, P.A., KLINE & SPECTER GROUP and KLINE & SPECTER, PC
Type: Other Statutes RICO
Samsel v. The Prudential Insurance Company of America
as 5:2010cv00459
Plaintiff: Rose Samsel
Defendant: The Prudential Insurance Company of America
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Type: Contract Insurance
Darryl Samsell et al v. Wellpoint, Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2009cv06079
Plaintiff: Darryl Samsell, Valerie Samsell, Mary Cooper and others
Consolidated Plaintiff: Valerie O'Brien, Ivette Rivera-Giusti and Kevin O'Brien
Defendant: Wellpoint, Inc., Wellpoint Health Networks, Inc., Anthem, Inc. and others
Consolidated Defendant: John Doe Corporation 1-20 and Anthem Health Plans of Virginia, Inc. doing business as ANTHEM BLUECROSS AND BLUESHIELD
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0001 Antitrust Litigation
Rohn, et al v. TAP Pharmaceutical Products, I, et al
as 09-1887
Plaintiff - Appellee: MILTON GREENE, WILLIAM M. PORTER, LIBERTY NATIONAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY and others
Plaintiff - Appellant: DENNIS ROHN, BARBARA SENSING and VALERIE SAMSELL
Interested Party - Appellee: STATE OF IDAHO, STATE OF ILLINOIS, STATE OF KENTUCKY and others
Defendant - Appellee: TAP PHARMACEUTICAL PRODUCTS, INC., ABBOTT LABORATORIES and TAKEDA PHARMACEUTICAL COMPANY, LIMITED
Interested Party: SOUTHEASTERN UROLOGICAL CENTER, P.A., KLINE & SPECTER GROUP and KLINE & SPECTER, PC
Type: Other Statutes RICO
SAMSELL et al v. WELLPOINT, INC. et al
as 2:2009cv00667
Plaintiff: DARRYL SAMSELL and VALERIE SAMSELL
Defendant: WELLPOINT, INC., WELLPOINT HEALTH NETWORKS, INC. and ANTHEM, INC.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Derek Hamilton, et al v. Ashland County Board of Electi, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 08-4439
Plaintiff - Appellant: DEREK HAMILTON, XAVIER BROCK, DAVID LEE SWEAZY and others
Defendant - Appellee: ASHLAND COUNTY BOARD OF ELECTIONS, DENNIS RAGLE, BONNIE MANOS and others
Hamilton et al v. Ashland County Board of Elections et al
as 1:2008cv02546
Plaintiff: Derek Hamilton, Xavier Brock, Chevin Joseph Rout and others
Defendant: Ashland County Board of Elections, Dennis Ragle, Bonnie Manos and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Type: Civil Rights None
Samsel v. Hamblen County Jail We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2008cv00192
Plaintiff: Henry P Samsel
Defendant: Hamblen County Jail
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2008cv01915
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?