Cases 41 - 50 of 55
Shannon Brown v. Burlington Northern Santa Fe R
as 13-2102
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SHANNON BROWN
Defendant - Appellee:
BURLINGTON NORTHERN SANTA FE CORPORATION
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2012cv03508
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Fisher et al v. Dallas County et al
as 3:2012cv03604
Plaintiff:
Darian Fisher and LaParker Smith
Defendant:
Dallas County , Shannon Brown , Dallas County Commissioner's Court and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Foster et al v. SunTrust Mortgage, Inc.
as 1:2012cv01716
Plaintiff:
Pamela R. Foster , Sherri P. Davis and Shannon Brown
Defendant:
SunTrust Mortgage, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 216
Shannon Brown v. Burl Cain, Warden
as 12-30126
Petitioner - Appellant:
SHANNON BROWN
Respondent - Appellee:
BURL CAIN, WARDEN, LOUISIANA STATE PENITENTIARY
Brown v. Cain et al
as 2:2011cv02267
Plaintiff:
Shannon Brown
Defendant:
Burl Cain
Respondent:
Attorney General State of Louisiana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2011cv02153
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Not Classified By Court:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Perales et al v. United States Internal Revenue Service et al
as 1:2011cv02172
Petitioner:
Azael Dythian Perales
Respondent:
United States Internal Revenue Service, USA, U.S. Federal Bureau Of Investigation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Perales v. U.S. Marshal Service, et al
as 2:2011cv01621
Plaintiff:
Azael Dythian Perales
Defendant:
U S Marshals Service, Central Intelligence Agency, Stacia Hylton and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Brown v. McDonald and Company Insurance Agency, Inc.
as 5:2010cv00232
Plaintiff:
Shannon Brown
Defendant:
McDonald and Company Insurance Agency, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
