Cases 41 - 50 of 606
TEMPLETON v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv07911
Plaintiff:
DAVID SCOTT TEMPLETON
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-1362
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
PERRY v. POPE et al
as 1:2023cv00456
Plaintiff:
JASON S. PERRY
Defendant:
C. POPE, C. HOLCOMB, FRANK VANIHEL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MARTIN v. WELLINGTON et al
as 2:2023cv00083
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY MARTIN
Defendant:
THOMAS WELLINGTON, WILMORE, CARPETTER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MARTIN v. HOLCOMB et al
as 2:2023cv00078
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY MARTIN
Defendant:
CHRISTHOPER HOLCOMB, VARTHEL, RUSSELL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Templeton v. Parks et al
as 3:2023cv00109
Plaintiff:
Aaron Templeton
Defendant:
Scott Parks, Justin Stanke, Judge Strausser and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Templeton v. Parks et al
as 2:2023cv00202
Plaintiff:
Aaron Templeton
Defendant:
Sheriff Scott R Parks, Justin Stanke, Judge Strausser and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Templeton v. Gregg County Sheriff's Office
as 6:2023cv00078
Plaintiff:
Robert Charles Templeton
Defendant:
Gregg County Sheriff's Office, Maxey Cerliano and Cpl. K. Beltran
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MARTIN v. DONOVAN et al
as 2:2023cv00058
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY MARTIN
Defendant:
NICHOLAS DONOVAN, MARK SMITH, ADAM JACKSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thompson v. Peters et al
as 3:2023cv50042
Plaintiff:
Elroda Shavaya Thompson and Elroda Shavon Thompson
Defendant:
Collette Peters, United States, Department of Justice and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
