Cases 41 - 50 of 1,099
Ferreira v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as 6:2019cv00758
Defendant:
Publix Super Markets, Inc., Imerys Talc America, Inc., Honeywell International, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth Ferreira
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1452
Biagetti v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as 1:2019cv00194
Defendant:
Honeywell International Inc., Columbia Boiler Company, Imerys Talc America, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Marilyn Biagetti
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1452 Removal of Claim in Civil Action Related to BK. Case
Dorothy Smith v. Schlage Lock Company, LLC
as 19-1391
Defendant:
THE RUST ENGINEERING COMPANY, GOULDS PUMPS, INCORPORATED, BRIGGS & STRATTON CORPORATION and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DOROTHY E. SMITH, Individually and as Executrix of the Estate of Julian Jackson Smith
Defendant / Appellee:
SCHLAGE LOCK COMPANY, LLC and FARMERS CHEMICAL ASSOCIATION, INC.
Morrison et al v. Air Parts & Supply, Co. et al
as 1:2019cv20837
Defendant:
The Boeing Company, Air Parts & Supply, Co., Honey International, Inc., f/k/a Allied Signal, as successor-in-interest to Allied Corporation, as successor in interest to The Bendix Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
Roy E Morrison and Connie L Gladhill
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Houston v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2019at00066
Defendant:
Honeywell International Inc., f/k/a Alliedsignal Inc., as success-in-interest to the Bendix Corporation, The Boeing Company, Owens-Illinois, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Sherrie Houston
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Louis Peete et al v. Foster Wheeler LLC
as 2:2019cv00111
Defendant:
Foster Wheeler LLC, York International Corporation, Pacific Ship Repair and Fabrication, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Rosie Peete and Louis Peete
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Farris et al v. 3M Company et al
as 4:2018cv04186
Defendant:
IMO INDUSTRIES, INC. (sued individually and as successor-in-interest to DELAVAL TURBINE, INC.), BORGWARNER MORSE TEC LLC individually and as successor-in-interest, parent, alter ego and equitable trustee of BORG-WARNER CORPORATION, VIGOR INDUSTRIAL LLC (individually and as successor-in-interest to TODD SHIPYARD CORPORATION) and others
Plaintiff:
MELVA FARRIS and GARY FARRIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Cupp v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation, as Successor by Merger to Buffalo Pumps, Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv10168
Defendant:
Union Carbide Corporation, BW/IP, Inc., Warren Pumps LLC and others
Cross Claimant:
Crane Co., Carrier Corporation, CBS Corporation and others
Cross Defendant:
Ericsson, Inc., Industrial Holdings Corporation, Armstrong International, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Gail Cupp, James Cupp, Jason Cupp and others
Not Classified By Court:
Robert B. Collings, Edward F. Harrington and Judge Donald L Cabell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Asbestos Litigation
Medeiros, Jr. v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Company et al
as 1:2017cv12516
Defendant:
SB Decking, Inc. f/k/a Selby, Battersby & Company, PPG Architectural Finishes, Inc. as Successor-in-Interest to Akzo Nobel Paints LLC f/k/a The Glidden Company, Bird, Inc. a/k/a Bird and Son, Inc. and others
Cross Claimant:
Bayer Cropscience, Inc. as Successor to Amchem, Inc., New England Insulation Company, General Electric Company and others
Cross Defendant:
Ingersoll-Rand Company, Turner Construction Company, Eugene R. Medeiros, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Asbestos Litigation
Gorton et al v. Air & Liquid Systems Corp. et al
as 1:2017cv01110
Defendant:
Borgwarner Morse TEC, General Refractories Company, Ingersoll-Rand Company and others
Cross Defendant:
American Refractories, Pfizer, Inc., Martin Marietta Materials, Inc. and others
Cross Claimant:
Georgia-Pacific, LLC, Honeywell International, Inc., Bayer Cropscience, LP and others
Amicus Curiae:
Rhonda J. Gorton
Special Master:
Judge Russell M. Nigro
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
