Cases 41 - 50 of 248
Terrebonne Parish Consolidated Government v. United States Department of Transportation et al
as 2:2021cv00701
Defendant:
United States Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration and Federal Highway Association
Plaintiff:
Terrebonne Parish Consolidated Government President and Terrebonne Parish Consolidated Government
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
No More Freeways et al v. United States Department of Transportation et al
as 3:2021cv00498
Plaintiff:
No More Freeways, Eliot Neighborhood Association and Neighbors for Clean Air
Defendant:
United States Department of Transportation, Thomas D. Everett and United States Federal Highway Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4321
Wilbur Slockish, et al v. USDOT, et al
as 21-35220
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CAROL LOGAN, a resident of Oregon, and an enrolled member of the Confederated Tribes of Grande Ronde, MOUNT HOOD SACRED LANDS PRESERVATION ALLIANCE, an unincorporated nonprofit association, WILBUR SLOCKISH, Hereditary Chief of the Klickitat/Cascade Tribe and others
Defendant / Appellee:
FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION, an Agency of the Federal Government, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT, an Agency of the Federal Government and others
Amicus Curiae:
JEWISH COALITION FOR RELIGIOUS LIBERTY, PROTECT THE 1ST, THE SIKH COALITION and others
THE NATIONAL ASSOCIATION FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF COLORED PEOPLE ERIE UNIT 2262 et al v. FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION et al
as 1:2020cv00362
Plaintiff:
CITIZENS FOR PENNSYLVANIA'S FUTURE and THE NATIONAL ASSOCIATION FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF COLORED PEOPLE ERIE UNIT 2262
Defendant:
PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION and FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4321
Little Rock Downtown Nbrhd, et al v. FHA, et al
as 20-2910
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Dale Pekar, Forest Hills Neighborhood Association Inc., Little Rock Downtown Neighborhood Association Inc. and others
Defendant / Appellee:
Arkansas Department of Transportation, Lorie Tudor, Director, Arkansas Department of Transportation (originally named as Scott Bennett), Federal Highway Administration and others
R.L. Vallee, Inc. v. Vermont Agency of Transportati
as 20-2665
Defendant / Appellee:
Joe Flynn, in his official capacity as Secretary of the Agency of Transportation, Vermont Agency of Transportation, an Agency of the State of Vermont other State of Vermont, Federal Highway Administration, an Agency of the United States Department of Transportation other United States Department of Transportation and others
Plaintiff:
Timberlake Associates, L.L.P. and WESCO, Inc.
Plaintiff / Appellant:
R.L. Vallee, Inc.
FIGG BRIDGE ENGINEERS, INC. et al v. FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION et al
as 1:2020cv02188
Plaintiff:
FIGG BRIDGE ENGINEERS, INC. and WILLIAM PATE
Defendant:
HARI KALLA and FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0701
Eyster et al v. Alabama Department of Transportation et al
as 5:2020cv00172
Plaintiff:
Susan Noble, John C. Eyster, James S. Speake and others
Defendant:
Mark Barlett, Federal Highway Administration, Alabama Department of Transportation and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4321
Short et al v. Federal Highway Administration et al
as 1:2019cv00285
Plaintiff:
Sandra Short, David Short, Donald Short and others
Defendant:
United States Forest Service, Lee Potter, Federal Highway Administration and others
Petitioner:
Billings County, North Dakota
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Highlands Ranch Neighborhood v. Cater, et al
as 19-1190
Defendant / Appellee:
COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, JOHN M. CATER, in his official capacity as the Division Administrator, Colorado Division of the Federal Highway Administration, SHAILEN P. BHATT, in his official capacity as the Executive Director of the Colorado Department of Transportaion and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
HIGHLANDS RANCH NEIGHBORHOOD COALITION, a Colorado non-profit corporation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
