Cases 41 - 50 of 1,308
Hankerson v. HIPPA et al
as 1:2024cv01402
Plaintiff:
Theresa Ann Hankerson
Defendant:
HIPPA, Post Office, IRS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Turner v. Pacer Service Center et al
as 1:2024cv00760
Plaintiff:
Terrance Turner
Defendant:
Pacer Service Center, Officer of the Solicitor, U.S. Department of Justice and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00221
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Coe v. USA
as 24-10119
Plaintiff:
Morris Russell Coe, Jr.
Defendant:
United States of America, Internal Revenue Service, IRS Agents, Any/All and others
Incorrectly filed
as 4:2024cv00510
Plaintiff:
Mr. Rowland M. Andrade and Incorrectly Filed
Defendant:
ABTC Corp. and IRS (United States of America)
Cause Of Action: 88 U.S.C. § 8888 Other Statutory Actions
Incorrectly Filed
as 4:2024cv00511
Plaintiff:
Mr. Rowland M. Andrade and ABTC Corp.
Defendant:
IRS - SD TX
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Right to Privacy Act
Softwho et al v. Microsoft Incorporated et al
as 3:2024cv00025
Plaintiff:
Softwho and Mr. Joseph Andrew Stanford
Defendant:
Microsoft Incorporated, Cisco Systems Incorporated, IRS Internal Revenue Service and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Marshall v. Internal Revenue Service et al
as 1:2024cv01179
Plaintiff:
Julita Marshall and Julita McGowan
Defendant:
Internal Revenue Service and IRS Commissioner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement
Alan v. IRS et al
as 6:2024cv06076
Plaintiff:
David P. Alan
Defendant:
IRS, U.S. Atty. David J. Hickton, Assist. U.S. Atty. Paul E. Hull and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Hall v. Internal Revenue Service et al
as 2:2024cv10270
Plaintiff:
Vivian Leigh Hall
Defendant:
Internal Revenue Service and IRS Commissioner
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
