Cases 41 - 50 of 64
Gayler v. Eight Judicial District Court et al
as 2:2016cv01057
Defendant:
Timothy Andrews, Clark County, Eighth Judicial District Court and others
Plaintiff:
Brandyn Gayler
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ENDRE v. USA
as 1:2016cv00419
Petitioner:
TIMOTHY ANDREW ENDRE
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv00684
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12112
Kellis v. Carlin
as 3:2015cv00094
Petitioner:
Timothy Andrew Kellis
Respondent:
Carlin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Christiansen v. Rutheron Water Association et al
as 1:2014cv00467
Plaintiff:
Gene Christiansen
Defendant:
Rutheron Water Association, Donna Agnew, Timothy Andrews and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
McCaffrey v. Gatekeeper USA, Inc et al
as 1:2014cv00493
Plaintiff:
Timothy Andrew McCaffrey
Defendant:
Gatekeeper USA, Inc, Asgard International, Inc, Ares Ventures Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv05642
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158 Notice of Appeal re Bankruptcy Matter (BAP)
Wilson v. Wilson et al
as 1:2013cv00237
Plaintiff:
Timothy Andrew Wilson
Defendant:
Jessica Lee Wilson, John Doe #1 and John Doe #2
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Timothy Wilson v. Brent T. Calhoun
as 13-6057
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TIMOTHY ANDREW WILSON
Defendant - Appellee:
BRENT T. CALHOUN, Sergeant/Police Officer, Individually and in his official capacities
Wilson v. Calhoun
as 1:2012cv01430
Plaintiff:
Timothy Andrew Wilson
Defendant:
Brent T. Calhoun
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
