Cases 41 - 50 of 178
Tutt v. State of Nevada
as 3:2020cv00722
Respondent:
Nevada, State of, Nevada Attorney General and Perry Russell
Petitioner:
Evans Tutt
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Tutt v. USA
as 6:2020cv00238
Petitioner:
Michael Tutt
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Johnson et al v. Sherman-Williams Lead Industries Association Inc. et al
as 6:2020cv02122
Plaintiff:
James Lavon Caudle, Dino Reveas, Floyd Johnson and others
Defendant:
Conagra Grocery Products Company, SCM Corporation, Atlantic Richfield Co. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harrell et al v. Tutt, Taylor & Rankin Real Estate LLC et al
as 1:2020cv01347
Plaintiff:
John E. Harrell and Dawn D. Harrell
Defendant:
Brendan Muha, Tutt, Taylor & Rankin Real Estate LLC and Tutt, Taylor & Rankin Real Estate LLC doing business as TTR Sotheby's International Realty
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
US v. Keith Tutt
as 20-7626
Defendant / Appellant:
KEITH LAMONT TUTT
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Ray v. Williams et al
as 2:2020cv03337
Defendant:
Assistant Warden Roberson, Nurse O., Captain Terry and others
Plaintiff:
Aquavious JuJuan Ray
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TUTT v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv40201
Defendant:
3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
THOMAS TRANT TUTT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ivory v. Tutt et al
as 5:2020cv00727
Plaintiff:
Patrick Dean Ivory
Defendant:
Faron Blaney, James E Stewart, Sr and Charles G Tutt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Taylor v. Shreveport et al
as 5:2020cv00475
Defendant:
District Attorneys Office Caddo Parish, City of Shreveport, Ben Raymond and others
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Taylor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CASTILLO v. TUTT et al
as 1:2020cv01003
Plaintiff:
MIGUEL R CASTILLO and MIGUEL CASTILLO
Defendant:
ELAM and J TUTT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
