Cases 41 - 50 of 53
Carter v. Sullivan et al
as 3:2012cv00060
Plaintiff:
Audrey Carter
Defendant:
Greg Sullivan, Steve Hallett, Tera Teague Walters and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Tyrone Hurt, et al v. USA, et al
as 11-4403
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TYRONE HURT
Plaintiff - Appellee:
BRADY GUN PREVENTION CAMPAIGN
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, et al and US SECRET SERVICE, (1861) (1949-)
Rutledge v. US Secret Service
as 1:2011cv08392
Plaintiff:
Joseph Rutledge
Defendant:
US Secret Service
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1985
Tyrone Hurt, et al v. USA, et al
as 11-4081
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TYRONE HURT
Plaintiff - Appellee:
BRADY GUN PREVENTION CAMPAIGN
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, et al and US SECRET SERVICE, (1861) (1949-)
Seamster v. US Department of Justice et al
as 2:2011cv00371
Plaintiff:
Deborah R Seamster
Defendant:
US Department of Justice, US Secret Service and FBI Headquarters
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Azael Dythian Perales v. Orange County Sheriffs Department et al
as 8:2011cv00824
Respondent:
Don Bankhead, Patricia C Bates, Ben S Bernanke and others
Petitioner:
Azael Dythian Perales
Kampinen v. U.S. Department of Commerce et al
as 1:2011cv02888
Plaintiff:
Dianne Kampinen
Defendant:
U.S. Department of Commerce, Gary Locke, Robert Groves and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
Perales v. Federal Election Commission, et al
as 10-8040
Petitioner:
AZAEL DYTHIAN PERALES
Respondent:
FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION, CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY, FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION and others
Mitchell v. US Secret Service
as 4:2009cv03258
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Nicole Mitchell
Defendant:
US Secret Service
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Raphael Weiner, et al v. Toni Garone, et al
as 09-3502
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RAPHAEL WEINER and TERRY WEINER, H/W
Defendant - Appellee:
TONI R. GARONE, SANTORO CONSTR, US SECRET SERVICE and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
