Cases 41 - 50 of 724
Hogan and Associates Construction et al v. Urban Commons 6th Ave Seattle et al
as 1:2022cv00110
Plaintiff:
Hogan and Associates Construction, William A Smith and Jenny R Smith
Defendant:
Urban Commons 6th Ave Seattle and Eagle Nashville Airport Hotel
SMITH v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv16369
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM NEAL SMITH
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Smith v. Franklin County Sheriff's Department et al
as 3:2022cv01655
Plaintiff:
William L. Smith
Defendant:
Franklin County Sheriff's Department and Paul Uraski
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SMITH v. DIXON
as 4:2022cv00277
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM C SMITH
Defendant:
RICKY D DIXON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
USA v. Smith
as 22-10704
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
William Lamar Smith
Lawrence Brannen v. William Smith
as 22-12268
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LAWRENCE ANTHONY BRANNEN
Defendant / Appellee:
WILLIAM L. SMITH, Individual and Official Capacity
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-1515
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Jaye v. United States et al (MAG +)
as 2:2022cv00376
Plaintiff:
Chris Jaye
Defendant:
United States, Merrick B. Garland, John G. Roberts and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Weakley v. City of Richmond et al
as 3:2022cv00447
Plaintiff:
John D. Weakley
Defendant:
City Of Richmond, Benjamin J. Frazer, Jacob D Capra and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Schmidt et al v. City of Richmond et al
as 3:2022cv00404
Plaintiff:
Charles H. Schmidt, Jimmie Lee Jarvis, Kristopher C. Goad and others
Defendant:
City of Richmond, William C. Smith, William Blackwell and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
