Cases 41 - 50 of 354
Johnson v. Zook et al
as 1:2022cv00920
Plaintiff:
Laddarion Johnson
Defendant:
David Zook, Robert Whitt, A.J. Green and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Bivens Prisoner
SHELDON v. ZOOK
as 1:2022cv01868
Petitioner:
GARY THOMAS SHELDON
Respondent:
K. ZOOK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Fleming v. Zook
as 5:2022cv00463
Petitioner:
Rhonda Fleming
Respondent:
FNU Zook
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
NOBLE et al v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
as 1:2022cv01206
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW NOBLE, MATTHEW SMITH, JONIE SMITH and others
Defendant:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Head v. Zook
as 5:2022cv00339
Petitioner:
Charles Head
Respondent:
K Zook
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Zook v. Legenhousen, et al.
as 3:2022cv00510
Plaintiff:
Amanda Zook
Defendant:
Richard Legenhousen and Brian Burdine
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Charles Carter v. Correctional Officer Cole
as 22-6417
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHARLES KENZELL CARTER
Defendant / Appellee:
CORRECTIONAL OFFICER COLE, CORRECTIONAL OFFICER C. POWERS, CORRECTIONAL OFFICER M. RUTLEDGE and others
Broadfield v. USA
as 22-10519
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Brian Broadfield
Defendant / Appellee:
United States of America, NFN Russell, Doctor, NFN Zook, Warden and others
Broadfield v. United States of America et al
as 3:2022cv00860
Plaintiff:
Brian Broadfield
Defendant:
United States of America, NFN Russell, NFN Zook and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Forbes v. Zook et al
as 3:2022cv00687
Plaintiff:
Michael Ray Forbes
Defendant:
R Zook, FCI Seagoville, United States of America and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
