Cases 51 - 60 of 42,278
BARTOSZEK v. LIFEBRAND, INC. et al
as 1:2024cv05273
Plaintiff:
RAY BARTOSZEK
Defendant:
LIFEBRAND, INC., THOMAS J COLAIEZZI, GREGORY J HILL and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Procter v. Farmington Hills Police Department
as 2:2024cv11520
Plaintiff:
Clark Procter
Defendant:
Farmington Hills Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hill v. Santiagos et al
as 4:2024cv03519
Plaintiff:
Cymeyon V. Hill
Defendant:
Santiagos, Tom, Monique and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hill v. Arlean et al
as 4:2024cv03522
Plaintiff:
Cymeyon V. Hill
Defendant:
Arlean and Dr. Mann
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hurst v. Auburn Hills Police Department et al
as 4:2024cv11522
Plaintiff:
Arnold Hurst
Defendant:
Auburn Hills Police Department, Moore and Bryant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Joe Ledezma v. James Hill
as 2:2024cv04888
Petitioner:
Joe Ledezma
Respondent:
James Hill
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Rutledge v. Wake Forest University School of Medicine et al
as 3:2024cv00404
Defendant:
William Richardson, Juilene Almond, Wake Forest University School of Medicine and others
Plaintiff:
Christopher R. Rutledge, A M R, A D R and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HILL v. USA
as 1:2024cv00874
Plaintiff:
LISA MICHELLE HILL
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491 Tucker Act
HIll et al v. Lanigan Worldwide Moving and Warehousing, Inc.
as 2:2024cv02235
Not Yet Classified:
Joe W. Brown
Plaintiff:
Michael J. HIll and Sheena Reed-Hill
Defendant:
Lanigan Worldwide Moving and Warehousing, Inc. d/b/a Berger Transfer and Storage
Hill (PS) v. Bradshaw et al
as 1:2024cv01049
Plaintiff:
Deddrick Hill
Defendant:
Bradshaw and Haughmen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
