Cases 51 - 60 of 94
Coleman v. Unum Group Corporation
as 1:2015cv00192
Plaintiff:
P. Michael Coleman
Defendant:
Unum Group Corporation
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1145
MILLER v. LIPSCOMB et al
as 1:2014cv02171
Plaintiff:
SELINA MILLER
Defendant:
JAMES LIPSCOMB, CITY OF COLUMBUS, MITCHELL J. BROWN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Rudolph Washington v. Tubbs, et al
as 14-31247
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RUDOLPH WASHINGTON
Defendant - Appellee:
MAJOR TUBBS and MICHAEL COLEMAN
RELVAS et al v. ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN et al
as 1:2014cv01752
Plaintiff:
JOHN RELVAS , ESTATE OF RUI RELVAS , ESTATE OF JOAO RELVAS and others
Defendant:
ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN and IRANIAN MINISTRY OF INFORMATION AND SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1605
United States of America v. Marrero (Martinez)
as 14-2744
Appellee USA:
United States of America
Defendant:
Nelson Marrero, Andrew Alston, AKA Drew High, Sammie Artis, AKA Poppy and others
Defendant - Appellant:
Jeffrey Martinez
FORTUNE et al v. GLAXOSMITHKLINE LLC. et al
as 2:2013cv05879
Plaintiff:
RONALD FORTUNE , MICHAEL HALL , MARY CLAYBORN and others
Defendant:
GLAXOSMITHKLINE LLC. and MCKESSON CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Fortune et al v. GlaxoSmithKline LLC. et al
as 3:2013cv03172
Defendant:
GlaxoSmithKline LLC. and McKesson Corporation
Plaintiff:
Ronald Fortune , Michael Hall , Mary Clayborn and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Fortune et al v. GlaxoSmithKline LLC. et al
as CAN/3:13-cv-03172
Defendant:
GlaxoSmithKline LLC. and McKesson Corporation
Plaintiff:
Ronald Fortune , Michael Hall , Mary Clayborn and others
Mark Morgan v. Jerry Bartruff, et al
as 13-1828
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Mark D. Morgan
Defendant - Appellee:
Jerry Bartruff, Gail Huckins, Kelli Collins and others
Campbell v. Dinius et al
as 0:2013cv00516
Petitioner:
James Paul Campbell
Respondent:
Joe Dinius, Public Storage, Brady Sweitzer and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
