Cases 51 - 60 of 103
Roberta Watterson v. Garfield Beach CVS, LLC
as 15-16623
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROBERTA WATTERSON, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated
Defendant / Appellee:
GARFIELD BEACH CVS, LLC
Discount Ramps.Com LLC v. Battery Marketing Associates Inc et al
as 2:2015cv00686
Plaintiff:
Discount Ramps.Com LLC
Defendant:
Battery Marketing Associates Inc, Motobatt USA Limited Inc, Gerald E. Watterson and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126
Watterson v. United States of America
as 1:2014cv00951
Plaintiff:
Calvin Watterson
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2674
Watterson v. Techtronic Industries North America, Inc. et al
as 6:2014cv00032
Plaintiff:
Richard Watterson
Defendant:
Techtronic Industries North America, Inc. , One World Technologies, Inc. and Ryobi Technologies, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Watterson v. Garfield Beach CVS LLC
as 4:2014cv01721
Defendant:
Garfield Beach CVS LLC
Plaintiff:
Roberta Watterson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Watterson v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2014cv06728
Plaintiff:
Karla Kay Watterson
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Watterson v. Mentor Worldwide LLC et al
as 2:2013cv30677
Plaintiff:
Karla Kay Watterson
Defendant:
Mentor Worldwide LLC and Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
WATTERSON et al v. ARMSTRONG COUNTY et al
as 2:2013cv01267
Plaintiff:
CLARENCE WATTERSON and MARTHA WATTERSON
Defendant:
ARMSTRONG COUNTY, DAVID HOGUE, JOHN DOE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Watterson v. Mentor Corporation et al
as 4:2013cv00383
Plaintiff:
Karla Kay Watterson
Defendant:
MENTOR CORPORATION and MENTOR WORLDWIDE LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Watterson v. Mentor Corporation et al
as MN/0:13-cv-02033
Plaintiff:
Karla Kay Watterson
Defendant:
Mentor Corporation and Mentor Worldwide LLC
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
