Cases 51 - 60 of 149
Albrecht et al v. Oregon Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2021cv00196
Plaintiff:
Daniel Fowler, Toren Pruden, Charles Withrow and others
Defendant:
Sue Washburn, Paula Myers, Ken Jeske and others
Petitioner:
Miles Erb, Leroy Lamont Wells and Serafin Pahua-Pahua
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Richmond v. US
as 21-125
Respondent:
CARL WARNER, JOSEPH AUGUSTA, CHARLES PINNIZZOTTO and others
Petitioner:
UNITED STATES
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv00024
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SMITH v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2020cv14966
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
ADAM SMITH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SMITH v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2020cv05409
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
ADAM SMITH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Mohammad Kargarian v. Papa John's Pizza
as 20-1959
Defendant:
ADAM SMITH, Store Manager, Papa John's Pizza, TRAVIS, Assistant Manager, Papa John's Pizza and JOSHUA, Assistant Manager, Papa John's Pizza
Defendant / Appellee:
PAPA JOHN'S PIZZA
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MOHAMMAD M. KARGARIAN
Smith v. Morrison et al
as 3:2020cv00593
Defendant:
James Morrison and Louisiana State Penitentiary
Plaintiff:
Adam Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Vannoy et al
as 3:2020cv00638
Defendant:
Louisiana State Penitentiary and Darell Vannoy
Plaintiff:
Adam Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Raynes v. Smith et al
as 6:2020cv01052
Plaintiff:
Charles Matthew Raynes
Defendant:
Chris Whitley and Adam Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2020cv00051
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
