Cases 51 - 60 of 126,667
Hodge v. AT&T Mobility LLC et al
as 3:2024cv01476
Plaintiff:
Terri Lynn Hodge
Defendant:
AT&T Mobility LLC and AT&T Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Unruh et al v. AT&T Mobility LLC et al
as 3:2024cv01473
Plaintiff:
Ryan Unruh and Christopher Isbell
Defendant:
AT&T Mobility LLC and AT&T Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Hasson et al v. AT&T Mobility LLC et al
as 3:2024cv01478
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Hasson and Chad Graddy
Defendant:
AT&T Mobility LLC and AT&T Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Kinchen et al v. AT&T Mobility LLC et al
as 3:2024cv01463
Plaintiff:
Mildred Kinchen and James Kinchen
Defendant:
AT&T Mobility LLC and AT&T Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Penning v. AT&T Inc.
as 3:2024cv01464
Plaintiff:
Stacy Penning
Defendant:
AT&T Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Sanford v. AT&T
as 3:2024cv01458
Petitioner:
Mary Loechel Sanford
Respondent:
AT&T
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Vita et al v. AT&T, Inc.
as 3:2024cv01465
Plaintiff:
David Vita, Daniel Mariscal, Charles Fairchild and others
Defendant:
AT&T Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Stephens et al v. AT&T et al
as 3:2024cv01456
Petitioner:
Raelun Stephens, Sr. and KR&R Appliance
Respondent:
AT&T and Automation Personnel Services Inc
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Freedom Patents LLC v. T-Mobile USA, Inc., et al.
as 4:2024cv00543
Plaintiff:
Freedom Patents LLC
Defendant:
T-Mobile USA, Inc. and T-Mobile US, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Yancey v. Payne et al
as 2:2024cv00114
Plaintiff:
John B Yancey
Defendant:
Dexter Payne, Christopher Johnson, K Matthews and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
