Cases
Cases 51 - 60 of 63
Andrew Lewis v. Abco Industries, Inc., et al.
as PAE/2:08-CV-72013
Plaintiff: Andrew Lewis
Defendant: Abco Industries, Inc
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv00232
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
US v. Andrew Privott We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 09-6310
Plaintiff - Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant: ANDREW LEWIS PRIVOTT
EnCana Oil & Gas (USA) Inc et al v. Lewis et al
as 5:2008cv01524
Plaintiff: EnCana Oil & Gas (USA) Inc and S W E P I L P
Defendant: Lee Andrew Lewis and Edna J Lewis
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Type: Contract None
US v. Andrew Privott We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 08-7171
Plaintiff - Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant: ANDREW LEWIS PRIVOTT
Lewis v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 8:2008cv00556
Plaintiff: Andrew Lewis
Respondent: Secretary, Department of Corrections and Attorney General, State of Florida
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Ronald Davis v. Ronald Pugh, et al
as 08-5326
Plaintiff - Appellant: RONALD L. DAVIS
Defendant - Appellee: RONALD PUGH, DIANA MCELHANEY, TERRY DENNEY and others
LEWIS v. ABCO INDUSTRIES, INC. et al
as 2:2008cv72013
Plaintiff: ANDREW LEWIS
Defendant: ABCO INDUSTRIES, INC., AEROQUUIP INTERNATIONAL, INC., AEROQUIP CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Type: Torts - Injury None
Ronald Davis v. Ronald Pugh, et al
as 1:2008cv00021
Plaintiff: Ronald L Davis
Defendant: Ronald Pugh, Diana McElhaney, Terry Denney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ewing v. Little et al
as 2:2007cv02783
Plaintiff: Andrew Ray Ewing
Defendant: George Little, Kenneth W. Locke, Tennessee Department of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?